I have now rounded off a couple of years of occasionally studying personal economy, how to get money and how to handle them. I was occasionally afraid of becoming a money-motivated person, but the study was necessary for the simple reason that they don't teach these essential subjects in school. (I am sure that if teachers did teach kids to save up, the teachers would be shot on sight, because the big financial institutions (as well as the short term economic health of the system) depends on spending and an indebted population.)

One thing I have learned is that beyond the basics outlined above (and even those you can find plenty of controversy about), nobody agrees on anything. Just when I thought I had something pinned down, in the next book I read they would say the opposite. What does this mean? It means that you are on your own, buddy. You have to study and decide for yourself what is true.

Furthermore, if you hope to do really well with money, you have to keep at it. You have to know a lot, and you have to know what is going on all the time. Just one example: it has become clear to me that while one might do well investing in individual stocks, it takes a hell of a lot of knowledge and work to do so. And even the experts regularly make huge mistakes. (70% of managed mutual funds do worse than the overall market!)

Honestly, I had hoped to get to a point where I could do well investing without a lot of continued study and worry. But I have not found that point, and I don't think I will. And since 1) I don't have nerves of steel and 2) I really am not very interested in money, I have decided it is not really worth it for me.

The attention I have to put on it has to come from somewhere. And I would rather put that attention on where I like to have it: on production, and on art, philosophy and spirituality. I suspect even economically that will pay off better for me, not to mention spiritually and emotionally.

Even the best solution I have found in investing, index funds, would take my attention. Because when the market as a whole goes down, I would lose money. And while historically it has paid off on an average, there has been periodes where it took many, many years for the money to even come out even. (The 1930s and the 1970s.) And it is just not worth it for me. So I have pulled out and just gone to the best savings accounts I could find. (And it pays to shop around.) (And it might not hurt to diversify here also, even though these are supposedly 100% safe. Use a couple of different institutions, and get some gold too.)

Even this took a little bit of courage: what if the stocks I didn't buy go up? That is a missed opportunity. There is just no way one can be certain. One has to make a choice. And my choice personally is to make as much money as I can without working more than I like, and live well beneath my means, and put my surplus in the best savings account I can, and forget about it, and concentrate on my work and my life. And also, while I have no scruples being a capitalist (making money from money), I still consider it more interesting to make money from actual production and value, so that is where I will put my attention.

When people tell you that you should expect double-digit returns on your investments, don't believe them. Anytime you get above maybe five percent (and that's before inflation), you get into risky waters. If you like risk, that's fine, but you must be aware that you're taking it on.

One must realize that THE ECONOMY CAN'T GROW TEN PERCENT PER YEAR. If it does, there's some kind of bubble. Why? Because money is based on real products, and the overall system of factories, transport methods, workers, education, etc, just can't grow that fast.

In other words, unless you're a gambler, you'll just have to face that a couple percent per year above inflation is all you will get at best. Those "the miracle of compound interest" calculations based on ten percent are BS. After a while I just settled down knowing that.

Don't feel obligated to give or lend your money to anybody. It is a pleasure to help and it has healing power to reach out to others, but only if it is voluntary.

Unless one inherits great wealth, these are issues one simply has to deal with somehow. And how one does it is a personal choice.

In Harry Browne's book Fail-safe Investing, I found a refinement to the worry-free savings principle I favor. Harry recommends four different kinds of investment in four equal parts, where each part responds differently to different economical climates, and the end result is an evened-out steady growth, and very rarely any loss. If one is worried about the stability of currencies, banks, and governments, that book is recommended, as is perhaps The Alpha Strategy, though parts of that one only applies to high-inflation times/areas.